The political philosophy of deception philosophy essay

Dedicated to both quality and accessibility, it seeks to give undergraduate students from all disciplines a platform to discuss and express philosophical ideas. All those interested in contributing an essay to the issue of the Journal to be published in the Spring of are invited to review the submission guidelines listed below. Every issue of the Journal has an overall theme. In recent years, the Journal has also published essays generated within disciplines and departments traditionally considered exterior to philosophy.

The political philosophy of deception philosophy essay

Select network Political philosophy is a subfield of philosophy that focuses heavily on the political, legal, and moral implications of different schools of thought within society.

It is a field that goes back thousands of years to the time of Socrates, and more recently Machiavelli and Hobbes. Socrates, Machiavelli, Hobbes, and political philosophy Over time, a number of philosphers have tried to delineate the inter-related areas of morailty, justice, and the place of indiviudals within society.

The political philosophy of deception philosophy essay

When choosing between identifying with either the Socratic school of thought or a Machiavellian Prince, it is important to answer the question of how important power is to the individual.

From a personal standpoint, I must admit that I identify with the Machiavellian point of view and therefore would rather be a Machiavellian Prince instead of a Socratic gadfly, which is a person that acts as a stimulating and provocative, though negative, agent of change.

In the present day, there is greater acceptance of the idea of changing moral judgementsinstead of one set of rules, for a number of philosophers and writers.

Machiavelli though, focuses not on morality, but on power. He pushes for the notion of the preservation of power by those that obtain it. Ultimately, Machiavelli argues that in terms of power, the end justifies the means. Socratic ideals within political philosophy Socrates operates under a much different premise when compared to that of Machiavellian.

Instead of assuming the inherent cruelty of some men, this doctrine preaches the importance of questioning why those that have power are able to morally have authority over others. The major doctrine comes from questioning the reasoning and rationale for any and all of the actions of those in power.

That being said, Socratic methods are usually a means of carefully justifying through inquiry actions that are morally permissible for all parties involved. Political philosophy and political actions The major rationale for discussing Machiavellen principles grows from this ideology, which allows for swift, efficient action in any given situation.

Socratic gadfly is an excellent means for making sure that every possible action is justified in that it can reduce all actions to a series of questions and, subsequently, ask if those carrying out said actions are justified and morally permissible in doing so.

But, the downside to such a thorough course of action is that it can slow down any real action to a crawl and a major debate that can ultimately end in a stalemate. A political issue or event can be quickly resolved because by the Machiavellian principle, one needs to simply arrive by whatever means possible to the optimal solution.

The major issue that derives from this principle is in that of the people that have power under such a system. However, if one makes this argument than they must also be opened to the possibility that the system can allow for a truly benevolent individual to take control of a political system and, with the ability to act decisively, can make swift, just, and fair actions to lead a group or state.

When examining how it seems that most entities operate in the world today, it seems evident that the vast majority of political groups operate under a very Machiavellian system.

The UN practices a carefully executed, debated approach before taking any action, and as a result, many feel this organization is relatively weak and powerless in terms of being able to take action and get the political process moving. On the other hand, when the President of the United States makes an executive order, immediate action is taken.

This is usually in response to an impending issue or concern that needs immediate action. Though the action can sometimes lead to the harm of a few, the country tends to follow a idea of justifying their actions by the results. Being that I am a person that wants to be able to make swift, decisive actions, I identify with the Machiavellian school of thought.

His work Leviathan has been called one of the most significant pieces of writing in modern political ideology, rivaling the works of many famous minds including Plato, Aristotle, Locke, and many others.

Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception | Alternet

Hobbes believes that humanity is in need of a strong, central authority in order to be kept in control and not descend into a state of chaos and political upheaval. Hobbes applies this ideology as a means of justifying actions carried out by those that have authority and power over those that are ruled and strongly feels that it is through the use of this doctrine that society will be able to be run peacefully in a controlled, normative fashion.

Hobbes presents ideas and conclusions regarding government and use of power in Leviathan. By the application of the social contract theory, Hobbes feels that there is only one way in which society should be governed. His conclusion is that the only true way for society to function is through that of an absolute sovereign power.

In this way, the people governed by that power will be more inclined to follow the laws laid down as they are absolute and the government in this case a single person with all the power has the ability to severely punish any and all those that would oppose its rule.Essay on Explaining Political Philosophy Words | 3 Pages.

Explaining Political Philosophy Political philosophy, or political theory, as it is also known, is about human condition, or, what humans are like. This political philosophy course considers what people should believe. Theorists such as Plato, Machiavelli, Nietzsche and Strauss have argued that unless certain truths about reality, politics, faith and liberal democracy are hidden from .

The political philosophy of deception philosophy essay

The Political Philosophy Of Deception Philosophy Essay. Short Research Paper 2 For Short Research Paper 2, answer the following questions: “How did the writings of Blackstone influence American Political Philosophy, and what evidence for this influence is seen in Tocqueville’s observations of .

Political Philosophy and Machiavelli Essay Machiavelli Niccolo Machiavelli is best known for his highly controversial ideas on politics. He began writing about his political ideas after the French invasion because of his desire to reunite Italy after the fall of the republic.

Political Philosophy: Steering the Middle Course Essay - Political philosophy is not a simple set of doctrines or theories; rather it is a way of life. The political philosopher’s life is a constant struggle between the political and the philosophical.

This list of philosophy essay topics has been constructed to assist students who wish to explore a number of ideas in a specific time period or in a distinct subfield of philosophy.

Topics have, accordingly, been grouped under two general headings: “Historical Periods” and “Subfields of Philosophy.”.

The Political Philosophy of Deception - ANU